http://www.shinyshelf.com/2010/07/28/sherlock-a-study-in-pink/ Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:08:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.shinyshelf.com/2010/07/28/sherlock-a-study-in-pink/comment-page-1/#comment-846 Jim Smith Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:29:08 +0000 http://www.shinyshelf.com/?p=3332#comment-846 I love the inversion of 'Rache' too, especially the dismissive way Cumberbatch spits it out. Isn't the conceit of "double pill" ending about the bluff/double bluff/triple bluff and/or reverse psychology of pushing one of the pill boxes forward? It's about whether Sherlock understands people or not, isn't it? I love the inversion of ‘Rache’ too, especially the dismissive way Cumberbatch spits it out. Isn’t the conceit of “double pill” ending about the bluff/double bluff/triple bluff and/or reverse psychology of pushing one of the pill boxes forward? It’s about whether Sherlock understands people or not, isn’t it?

]]> http://www.shinyshelf.com/2010/07/28/sherlock-a-study-in-pink/comment-page-1/#comment-844 Miche Doherty Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:12:26 +0000 http://www.shinyshelf.com/?p=3332#comment-844 I especially liked the inversion of the RACHE clue: a nice joke for those familiar with Scarlet that won't have left new viewers feeling they'd been left out of something. All in all a great piece of TV. However, I can't see that Holmes's crucial choice towards the end came down to anything but a blind guess. I especially liked the inversion of the RACHE clue: a nice joke for those familiar with Scarlet that won’t have left new viewers feeling they’d been left out of something. All in all a great piece of TV. However, I can’t see that Holmes’s crucial choice towards the end came down to anything but a blind guess.

]]>